Juror+2

Thursday 5/28/09 Vesa Govori:Pages 238-281 Based on the evidence do you think the jury made fair decisions regarding the charges against Steve Harmon and James King? Support your answer for both with evidence from the trial.

Based on the evidence I do think that the jury made a decision regarding the charges against Steve Harmon and James King. For example, much of the evidence brought to the jury showed that Steve was not a lookout and was not there at that day. Also, Steve showed the jury that James and him are not alike when he got up on the stand. Furthermore I do think that James King was right at being put to jail for the time he got, because based on the information the jury heard and I heard James was guilty.

One of your duties as a juror is to weigh the facts presented at the trial to determine guilt or innocence. Listen carefully to the information provided, and enter your information in the space provided. Remember, your decision will effect the rest of the defendants' lives! Alexis 5/26/09:Steve's testimony was honest because he was including where he was during the robbery, where he was on December 22nd. Well he needed to the the truth so that the jury wouldn't take him to be a monster anymore in the eyes of the jury. I also don't believe that steve did the honest thing by not telling the truth in court be casue then if he didn't tell the truth he could be in trouble and he might have been put in jail for lieing in the courtroom during his testimony

Drew-I do not think it is fair that steve could get the same punishment as the people who actually committed the murder. first, all steve did was, maybe, give king and bobo the signal. second, king was the one who actually did the murder so king should have a harsher punishment. last, steve should only get punished for guilty by association, because he never really did anything bad.